Manage Parents’ Timing Thinking Apply at Children’s Timing Attitudes?

Analyses that have attitudes and you can requirement because centered parameters don’t possess clear temporary buying since the all ideational factors have been counted likewise from the baseline. Parental attitudes fundamentally are present before kid’s attitudes and you can, whenever you are there is certainly specific determine out of children’s attitudes on parental attitudes, the majority of the newest intergenerational has an effect on concerning the perceptions primarily efforts out-of parents to pupils (Thornton et al. 2008). Subsequent, earlier research indicates you to definitely thinking influence requirement, in the place of requirement impacting attitudes (Fishbein and you can Ajzen 2010). It’s of good use, not, to save the chance of mutual causation between perceptions from parents and children in mind even as we interpret show, and the possibility of reverse causation where expectations influence thinking.


Earliest, i checked-out theory step 1 because of the examining in the event the children’s relationship timing thinking resemble their parents’ perceptions (Arrow step 1, Fig. step 1 ). Coefficients regarding linear regression type child’s greatest age during the wedding get in the Desk 3 . When moms and dads value elderly ages in the matrimony, kids was significantly more likely to value more mature age, nevertheless impression size is small. For each and every a lot more 12 months away from most useful years offered by a mother and you can father try of a rise out of 0.05 and you may 0.07 decades, correspondingly, in the children’s most useful years (Designs step 1 and you may dos). These confident coefficients to own mothers’ and you will fathers’ ideal many years in addition to are still a similar otherwise is somewhat shorter when the two details is as part of the exact same formula (Design step three). Because point guess getting fathers’ top decades (0.07) try slightly larger than that of mothers’ (0.05), which difference in the fresh new coefficients is not statistically significant.

Dining table step 3

Coefficients and you can strong fundamental mistakes of average the very least squares regressions off children’s better years in the wedding (attitudes) (n = 1562)

* p step one ) and theory 3 you to definitely parents’ time perceptions yourself determine child’s standards, websites regarding child’s individual perceptions (Arrow step three, Fig. step one ). The fresh purchased logistic regression types of kid’s assumption out-of how in the near future they’ll marry was listed in Desk 4 . Habits step one–4 size time perceptions while the better ages in the relationship, when you find yourself Activities 5–8 size timing attitudes by comparing child’s baseline age for the a number of acceptable ages.

Dining table cuatro

Kid’s and you will mothers’ top age did affect child’s criterion. Sure enough, whenever pupils in addition to their mothers appreciated older most useful years, children was basically less planning anticipate to marry soon. Especially, chances rates getting finest ages within relationship was 0.80 for kids (Model 1) and 0.93 for moms and dads (Model dos) (Table cuatro ). By contrast, the odds proportion having dad’s most useful chronilogical age of 0.97 is close to one to and not mathematically tall (Model step 3, Table cuatro ). This type of effects are separate; regarding full design along with about three family’s greatest age, the chances ratios keep nearly regular (Design 4, Table cuatro ).

The idea prices highly recommend kid’s individual greatest ages has the greatest influence on their requirement, when you are mom’s most readily useful many years try quicker influential and you will fathers’ better ages keeps a small determine or none anyway. Modified Wald examination reveal that chances rates to the child’s finest ages differ significantly throughout the chance percentages both for mom’s and dad’s most useful ages. Although not, the consequences out of mothers’ and you can fathers’ top age towards the kid’s standard do not disagree notably.

When computing timing attitudes by the contrasting child’s age into acceptable wedding age brackets for someone of its gender, there was further evidence one people and you can moms and dads try both influential, in various methods. When kid’s age is actually than the their particular timing thinking, a definite “too-soon” impact is provided. In case it is over 5 years “too soon,” youngsters provides from the one to-half chances out of expecting to wed in the future as compared to whenever it is step 3–5 years “too soon” (Habits 5 and you can 8). The idea prices of just one.30 (Model 5) and you may 1.35 (Model 8) advise that if it’s the latest “correct time” pupils have higher likelihood of hoping to wed in the future compared to when it is step 3–5 years “too early,” but these consequences aren’t mathematically high. The purpose estimate for kids just below the fresh new appropriate variety, on 1–24 months “too quickly,” ways he’s a bit expected to be prepared to marry soon that have area rates of just one.17 (Model 5) and you may 1.13 (Design 8), nevertheless these effects are also not statistically tall.